Avocats en Commercial Litigation

Julie Park

Julie Park | Product Liability Lawyer | Morrison Foerster Julie Park is the co-chair of Morrison Foerster’s Complex Litigation + Advisement practice group and managing partner of the San Diego office. Julie protects her clients’ products throughout the product life cycle. Drawing on her deep technical and legal experience, she counsels clients on consumer product safety regulation and pharmaceutical and medical device preemption. She manages complex and multijurisdictional litigation both in state and federal court and also guides clients through product recalls. Clients appreciate Julie’s ability to assess both the practical business implications and legal impact of a matter. They also value the way she recommends solutions that meet their objectives. Julie is committed to providing thought leadership for her clients. She is an editor of, and frequent contributor to, MoFo’s Class Dismissed blog, where she provides insights on class-action and product–related issues affecting companies in the consumer arena. She has been recognized for her writing as a top author in the JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards, 2016–2019. Julie is also committed to pro bono service and diversity in the legal profession. While at Harvard Law School, she worked at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, a nonprofit law firm that provides free legal services. She has continued her pro bono work at MoFo, which has resulted in her being a regular recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award from the California State Bar for pro bono contributions. She co-chairs the firm’s Women’s Strategy Committee and has served on the Associates Steering Committee of Athena San Diego, an organization that promotes professional growth for women executives and rising managers in science and technology. Julie brings an industry perspective to her work with MoFo. Before going to law school, she was a medicinal chemist at Pfizer, where she researched cancer drugs.

Morrison Foerster

Julie Rubenstein

Partner

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Julien Horn

Partner

De Gaulle Fleurance & Associés

Julien Luke

Partner

TLT

Julio Camejo

Partner. Specialist in criminal litigation, particularly related to economic or financial frauds and environmental law; civil responsibility, contractual and commercial litigation; judicial debt recovery and labor and administrative representation.

Headrick Rizik Alvarez & Fernández

Julio Canó

Senior Associate

Jiménez Peña

Julio César Pérez

Partner

Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez Abogados

Julio Iglesias

Uría Menéndez

Julio Luján

Senior Associate

BLP

Junaid Sohail

Junaid is an Associate in our litigation team. He has developed a strong commercial litigation practice, advising clients across a broad range of complex and high‑value disputes with a particular focus on shareholder disputes, breach of warranty claims, professional negligence, contractual disputes, financial services matters and pension‑related claims. Junaid acts for a diverse client base that includes private equity firms, investment and wealth management companies, property developers and SMEs. He supports clients through all stages of contentious matters — from early strategic advice and dispute avoidance through to litigation and resolution. His work is characterised by a pragmatic, commercially focused approach that ensures legal strategies align with wider business objectives. Alongside his professional practice, Junaid is deeply committed to community, governance and international development work. He serves as a Trustee of The Leeds East Primary Partnership, contributing to strategic oversight and educational outcomes across local schools. He also volunteers to support humanitarian and development projects in Uganda, Jordan and beyond, having helped to raise in excess of £60,000 for initiatives including clean water wells, food distribution, school refurbishments and refugee assistance. He’s also actively engaged in professional development, mentoring and collaborative work within the legal community. Junaid qualified in 2021 and joined us in 2023. He’s based in our Leeds office.

Brabners LLP

Jung Kim

Principal

Offit Kurman

Jusong WENG

Senior Partner

Kangda Law Firm

Justin Benson

Counsel - Litigation and Investigations

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner

Justin Bernick

Partner

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Justin Briggs

Specialist in Pension and Private Trusts Disputes and Head of the Pensions Disputes team.

Burges Salmon LLP

Justin Ellis

Justin Ellis litigates high-stakes business disputes from the filing of a complaint through appeal. He tries cases and argues appeals in federal and state courts, often on complex commercial and financial subjects. He has litigated in every level of the judicial system from state trial courts to the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Ellis has particular experience in bankruptcy, distressed debt, and structured finance litigation, with clients including corporations, hedge funds and asset managers, indenture trustees, family offices, and high net worth individuals. MoloLamken routinely handles cases with dozens of witnesses, massive document productions, and cutting-edge legal questions. Clients turn to Justin to push these cases through to resolution. And they depend on him to help distill technical, sprawling records into a clear – and compelling – story for trial. Justin regularly works with a wide range of experts, graphics and jury consultants, and lawyers from multiple firms to create a unified and efficient fighting force for the client. Together with the MoloLamken team, he has helped recover over $2 billion in settlements and judgments for clients over the last five years.

MoloLamken LLP

Justin Ismail

Justin is developing a broad practice spanning all of Chambers’ main practice areas, with particular interests in company and commercial disputes, property matters encompassing land, trusts, probate and charities, as well as building, town planning, building management, and landlord and tenant disputes. Justin regularly appears across all levels of the High Court, including as sole counsel in the Court of Appeal, and has appeared as led junior in the Court of Final Appeal on a number of occasions. He appears frequently in the Lands Tribunal and has conducted appeals in his own right in the Buildings Appeal Tribunal and the Town Planning Appeal Board. His practice also involves a wide range of advisory work. RECENT HIGHLIGHTS Ng Yuk Pui Kelly v Ng Lai Ling Winnie (as the executor of the estate of Dung Wai Man, Deceased) and ors [2021] HKCFA 40 (reported in (2021) 24 HKCFAR 401). Appeared for the plaintiff in the Court of Final Appeal in an important case which examines the scope and application of the doctrine of contractual estoppel (with Anthony Ismail). Also appeared in the substantive appeal in the Court of Appeal [2021] HKCA 724 (reported in [2021] 5 HKC 1); sole counsel in the Court of Appeal resisting the application for stay pending appeal and for leave to amend the appeal notice [2021] HKCA 134 (reported in [2021] 1 HKLRD 1037); and in the 21-day trial in the Court of First Insance [2019] HKCFI 210. Lam Kin Chung v Soka Gakkai International of Hong Kong Ltd [2022] HKCA 480 (reported in [2022] 4 HKC 202). Appeared for the company in the Court of Appeal, in the first appellate case to determine whether a member of a charitable company has standing to bring a derivative action under ss 732-734 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) in respect of wrongs done to it, and the first to hold that a member of a charitable company in Hong Kong must exercise his voting rights consistently with his fiduciary duty owed to the charitable objects of the company (led by Ambrose Ho S.C. and Michael Yin). Also appeared in the Court of First Instance [2018] HKCFI 747 (reported in [2018] 2 HKLRD 769 and [2018] 4 HKC 489). Fook Lee Holdings Limited v The Secretary for Transport and Housing [2022] HKCA 1855 (reported in [2023] 1 HKLRD 845). Appeared for the company in the Court of Appeal, in an application for leave to appeal against the Lands Tribunal’s interpretation of the Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap. 370) as regards to an applicant’s right to compensation from the Government for loss of temporary occupation of land (with Anthony Ismail). Tai Shing Lee Victor (trading as Lucky Reminbi Exchange Foreign Currency Co.) v Wu Ka Yu Jennie [2023] HKCA 960. Instructed as sole counsel for the appellant in the Court of Appeal, in a case concerning the breach of a services contract between foreign currency exchange operators. Leung Wai Ling Isewesg v Success Base Engineering Limited [2021] HKCA 310 (reported in [2021] 4 HKC 80). Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff landlord in the Court of Appeal, in a case concerning a dispute over the scope of a landlord’s obligations under a tenancy agreement. Also instructed in the Court of First Instance [2020] HKCFI 163. Emperor UA Cinemas Limited v Lark China Cinemas Investments Limited [2022] HKCFI 2316 (reported in [2022] HKCLC 969). Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff company to restrain the defendant company from presenting a winding-up petition. Estivo Limited v Bank Julius Baer & Co Ltd HCA 569/2024. Acting for the plaintiff against the defendant bank in a mis-selling case (led by Norman Nip S.C.) (ongoing). Bong Pik Li and Others v Tang Yi, As the Administratrix of the Estate of Bong Won Ling, Deceased and Others [2025] HKCFI 612. Acting for the defendant administratrix to resist an interlocutory injunction restraining her from administering the deceased’s estate (with Michael Yin) (ongoing). The Incorporated Owners of Wah Chun Industrial Centre & anor v Coca Investment Company Limited [2024] HKCFI 1617 (reported in [2024] 3 HKLRD 388). Acted for the respondent developer to resist an injunction restraining it from interfering with a purported right to use certain areas within an industrial building (led by Jenkin Suen S.C.). Also instructed as sole counsel to resist an application for leave to appeal against a transfer order [2024] HKCFI 3240. 黎偉雄 v 信和物業管理有限公司 (Sino Estates Management Company Limited) & anor [2022] HKLdT 68. Instructed as sole counsel for the respondent building manager in a 5-day billingual trial in the Lands Tribunal concerning the construction of a DMC and alleged breach of manager’s duties. Also instructed as sole counsel to resist the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal [2023] HKLdT 23. Town Planning Appeal No. 7 of 2021 (decision dated 28.02.2023). Instructed as sole counsel for the developer in a 3-day appeal before the Town Planning Appeal Boardagainst the Town Planning Board’s decision to refuse planning permission to construct a house on a site in Ngau Chi Wan Village. OTHER NOTABLE CASES Arbitration Acted for a US company in an HKIAC arbitration involving the breach of a contract concerning the sale and purchase of electronic goods. Building Advised on a question of interpretation arising out of ss B12.7 of the Code of Practice for Fire Safety in Buildings 2011 (led by Benjamin Yu S.C.). In the matter of appeals under s 44 of the Buildings Ordinance (Cap. 123) by the appellants in Appeal Case Nos. 19-23 (decision dated 26.09.2023). Instructed as sole counsel for the appellants in a preliminary hearing before the Buildings Appeal Tribunal appealing against the Building Authority’s orders for demolition of certain alleged unauthorised building works. Advised on the merits of an intended claim against a building contractor and appointed building professional for building works done in commercial premises that were later deemed unauthorised. Building management Advised the manager of a private luxury housing estate on the validity of an owners’ resolution resolving to set up a “special fund” understood within the meaning of Paragraph 4, Schedule 7 of the Building Management Ordinance (Cap. 344). Companies / Winding Up Re Jetlag Limited HCMP 766/2018 (ongoing). Appeared for the applicant in the Companies Court seeking relief under an unfair prejudice petition (with Joyce Leung). Also appeared in the related actions of HCA 834/2020 and HCA 835/2020 (with Joyce Leung). Advised the subsidiary company of a global conglomerate on a proposed application to invalidate a winding-up commenced under s 228A of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32). Re Lee Yang, Shiu Chuen Joyce [2021] HKCFI 2468 (reported in [2021] 4 HKLRD 252 and [2021] 6 HKC 515). Instructed as sole counsel for the applicant in the Court of First Instance, in a case concerning the grant of vesting orders for shares in a company previously held on trust by nominal companies that have been dissolved. The decision is of considerable interest and practical importance in light of its clarification of the law and procedure as regards joining the Secretary for Justice (or Attorney-General in a foreign jurisdiction) as a respondent before property can be properly vested in a beneficiary under s 52(1)(b)(iii) of the Trustee Ordinance (Cap. 29). Civil fraud Zief Incorporated v Tekchandani Ajai Mohan and ors [2021] HKCFI 38 (reported in [2021] 3 HKC 69). Acted for the plaintiff in a 3-day trial in the Court of First Instance, in a case concerning the restitution of funds mistakenly remitted to a third party recipient as a result of fraud (with Joyce Leung). Chow Pui Chu Betty v Ever Bridge Hong Kong International Limited DCCJ 3736/2021. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff in the District Court to obtain summary judgment against a defendant for the return of funds mistakenly remitted to it as a result of fraud. Commercial disputes Goldteam Group Ltd v Qin Hui [2021] HKCFI 2422 (reported in [2021] HKC 708). Appeared for the plaintiff in the Court of First Instance, in a case concerning the recovery of a loan debt of over HK$150 million (led by CY Li S.C.). The decision clarifies a vitally important point of procedural law, namely whether service of a writ within jurisdiction is valid where a defendant, who is not within jurisdiction at the time a writ is delivered, nonetheless acquires knowledge of it at the time and subsequently returns to jurisdiction prior to its expiry. To Yuk Fung v Wu Pun Yan [2020] HKCFI 400. Appeared for the defendant in the Court of First Instance concerning an appeal against a master’s decision on costs (led by Paul Lam S.C.). Maxim’s Caterers Limited v Max Joy Asia Limited [2024] HKDC 660. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff in a trial concerning the breach of a services contract. Employment Sebapharma China Limited and anor v Yeung Mang Yin Simon and ors HCA 610/2024, HCA 1328/2024 and HCA 1611/2024. Instructed by the defendant employee to resist a claim by the former employer for breach of employment contract. A&H Design Group Limited and anor v Cheung Hok Man Randoll and ors HCA 896/2025. Instructed by the plaintiff employer in a claim against a former employee for breach of employment contract. Advised the defendant employer on an application to set aside a judgment entered in its absence at the Labour Tribunal. Insurance Lo Siu Wa v Employees Compensation Assistance Fund Board and anor [2018] HKCFA 3 (reported in (2018) 21 HKCFAR 8 and [2018] 2 HKC 40). Appeared for a major insurance company in the Court of Final Appeal, in a case concerning the breadth of coverage of an insurance agreement understood in the context of the compulsory insurance scheme under Part IV of the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (Cap. 282) (with Anthony Ismail). Asia Shahid t/a International Business Point (Hong Kong) v China Ping An Insurance (Hong Kong) Company Limited [2023] HKCFI 1296 (reported in [2023] 4 HKC 35). Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff insured in the Court of First Instance, in an appeal against a master’s decision to strike out the insured’s claim on grounds of limitation. Land / property Chan Ka Fook v Chan Choi Kwong [2025] HKDC 1362. Instructed as sole counsel for the defendant in an 8-day bilingual trial to resist a claim for title over landed property. Wang Boheng v Yu Kafu [2025] HKCFI 4566. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff buyer in an action against the defendant seller for breach of a sale and purchase agreement of a property. Hill Concept Limited v Yuen Yun [2024] HKDC 1999. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff developer in an action against the defendant buyer for breach of a sale and purchase agreement of a property. Landlord and tenant Re UA Cinemas Circuit Limited HCCW 99/2021. Instructed as sole counsel for the applicant landlord in the Companies Court seeking (1) leave to commence proceedings against the respondent tenant company (formerly a well-known company running a chain of cinemas in Hong Kong) upon its presentation of a winding-up petition and (2) an order for immediate possession of premises. Jade Mate Limited v Chickeeduck Retail (Hong Kong) Limited HCA 1344/2020. Appeared for the plaintiff landlord in the Court of First Instance seeking an injunction to remove an unauthorised article from the defendant tenant’s shop premises (led by CY Li S.C.). 勤學樂園 對 黎嘉年及另一人 [2024] HKDC 585. Acted for the 1st Defendant in an application to strike out the Plaintiff’s claim for want of a reasonable cause of action. Proceedings were conducted in Chinese. Personal injuries Advised on the quantum of damages to be awarded to a person falling within the “Disaster” category of personal injuries (assisting Alice Mok, S.C.). Advised on the prospects of a claim for tort against the person arising out of an incident during the period of social unrest in 2019 (assisting Alice Mok, S.C.). Probate and administration In re the estate of Herman Hendrik Alberts [2019] HKCFI 2900. Instructed as sole counsel for the applicant in the Court of First Instance in a 2-day trial to resist the invalidation of a purported will and to obtain a grant of letters of administration. Public law / judicial review Chao Wei Ting Ronna v Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (interested party: Building Authority) [2019] HKCFI 2950 (reported in [2020] 1 HKLRD 467). Appeared for the interested parties in the Court of First Instance in a judicial review of a decision of the Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (with Anthony Ismail). Building Authority v Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (interested parties: Freedom Pacific Limited, Wave Treasure Investment Limited) [2018] HKCFI 2761 (reported in [2019] 1 HKLRD 513). Appeared for the interested parties in the Court of First Instance to resist a judicial review of a decision of the Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (with Anthony Ismail). Also instructed as sole counsel to vary a costs order nisi [2020] HKCFI 1245. Leelan Rukesh Marasinghe v Director-General of Civil Aviation [2022] HKCFI 2843. Appeared for the applicant in the Court of First Instance, in an application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Director’s decision to suspend the applicant’s medical certificate thereby rendering him unable to perform his licensed functions as a commercial pilot (led by Robert Whitehead S.C. and Thomas Lee). Town planning Town Planning Board v Town Planning Appeal Board FACV 8/2016 (unrep., 16.02.2017) (reported in (2017) 20 HKCFAR 196 and [2017] 2 HKC 372). Appeared for the interested parties in the Court of Final Appeal, in a case concerning whether the Town Planning Board has jurisdiction under s 17 of the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131) to review its own decisions on the fulfilment of conditions imposed when granting planning permission (led by Anthony Neoh S.C. and Anthony Ismail). Other Advised a major U.S. corporation on the consumer protection regime in Hong Kong as well as the interrelationship between representative proceedings brought under RHC O.15, r.12 and the class action regime brought under U.S. law (assisting Ambrose Ho S.C.). SEMINARS “Liquidation & Cross-border Insolvency: updates and practical tips”, CPD seminar (with Joyce Leung and Johnathan Tsang) (2025) “Common issues and practical tips on proceedings on administration of estates”, ALE webinar (with Jenkin Suen S.C.) (2024) “Recent updates on contentious probate”, CPD seminar (with Ambrose Ho S.C. and Michael Yin) (2024) “Recent SFC Enforcement Actions in Ramp and Dump Cases”, CPD seminar (with Norman Nip S.C., Adrian C.K. Wong and Roger Phang) (2022) “Judicial review against decisions of the Building Authority”, Law Lectures for Practitioners 2019 (held by the Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong) (with Anthony Ismail) “Plugging the Expectation Gap: The Future of Charities Regulation in Hong Kong”, CPD seminar (with Ambrose Ho S.C.) (2018)

Rede Chambers

Justin Sher

Justin counsels clients in complex business disputes. A thoughtful and tenacious advocate, he has served as lead counsel in multiple trials and regularly represents clients in federal and state courts, and in domestic and international arbitrations. Justin has achieved victories on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in a wide range of high-stakes matters, including cases involving contract disputes, allegations of fraud and securities fraud, business breakups, professional liability, breach of fiduciary duty claims, trust and estate issues, covenants not to compete, and disputes over intellectual property and trade secrets. Justin also advises clients in regulatory and criminal investigations. He has successfully defended clients against allegations of insider trading, market manipulation, government corruption, accounting fraud, antitrust violations, and tax fraud. Justin thrives on complex issues, taking a strategic approach to finding solutions where others have failed. Clients laud his creativity, credibility among judges and opposing counsel, and unflagging commitment to achieving superior outcomes on their behalf. Before founding Sher Tremonte, Justin practiced at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Kobre & Kim LLP, served as a Special Assistant District Attorney for the Kings County District Attorney’s Office, and, prior to law school, worked for the Financial Frauds Bureau of the New York County District Attorney’s Office.

Sher Tremonte

Justin Wolosz

Partner

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Justin Yip

Partner, Restructuring and Insolvency

Withers KhattarWong LLP

Justine Baakman

Counsel

Offit Kurman

Justine Codo

Associate at Aceris Law LLC Justine Codo, holds a Master’s degree in Economic Cooperation and International Business Law, co-directed by the Toulouse University Capitole and the Vietnam National University. During her Bachelor’s degree studies, Justine spent a year at the University of Quebec in Montreal and also obtained a University Diploma in French and international arbitration. Prior to joining Aceris Law, Justine was a trainee at an international law firm specialising in the representation of sovereign States in international arbitration, gaining experience in the ICSID, ICC, and UNCITRAL arbitration rules. She is currently attending the Paris Bar School, and she is awaiting admission to the French Bar. She is fluent in French and English, has intermediate proficiency in Spanish, and has basic knowledge of Vietnamese.

Aceris Law

Jérémie Doornaert

Jérémie is a Partner in our Dispute Resolution group in Brussels. As the Brussels office’s data protection expert, Jérémie advises clients on complex data protection and privacy issues including but not limited to full audit of processing activities, deploying GDPR compliance program, drafting all types of documents to ensure GDPR compliance and training relevant stakeholders. He also represents clients in commercial and IP litigation before the courts and advises clients on a wide range of contracts in the Life Sciences sector and commercial law (including soft IP, trade practices and regulatory legislation in the medical sector). Jérémie is a regular speaker at conferences and seminars. He also provides GDPR tailor made training sessions to the Life Sciences industry. Thanks to several secondments within major pharmaceutical and medical devices companies, Jérémie has acquired an in-depth knowledge of the Life Sciences sector. Jérémie is also the author of a book on GDPR and Belgian data protection law and the co-author of a Treaty of pharmaceutical law (both Kluwer publishing).

Simmons & Simmons

K.C. Hightower

Partner

Balch & Bingham LLP