Avocats en Arbitration
Parcourez les avocats en arbitration de juridictions du monde entier. Consultez chaque profil pour connaître les domaines d’expertise, les inscriptions au barreau, les langues et les coordonnées, puis prenez contact directement.
4 296 avocats référencés
Justin Gan
Justin is a dispute resolution partner that helps clients resolve commercial disputes whether in litigation, arbitration, mediation, or pre-proceedings. He has a strong focus on marine and international trade matters, and also handles non-contentious work in that sector. He is fluent in Mandarin and his matters often bear a Chinese element.
Stephenson Harwood
Justin Ilhwan Park
Partner
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Justin Ismail
Justin is developing a broad practice spanning all of Chambers’ main practice areas, with particular interests in company and commercial disputes, property matters encompassing land, trusts, probate and charities, as well as building, town planning, building management, and landlord and tenant disputes. Justin regularly appears across all levels of the High Court, including as sole counsel in the Court of Appeal, and has appeared as led junior in the Court of Final Appeal on a number of occasions. He appears frequently in the Lands Tribunal and has conducted appeals in his own right in the Buildings Appeal Tribunal and the Town Planning Appeal Board. His practice also involves a wide range of advisory work. RECENT HIGHLIGHTS Ng Yuk Pui Kelly v Ng Lai Ling Winnie (as the executor of the estate of Dung Wai Man, Deceased) and ors [2021] HKCFA 40 (reported in (2021) 24 HKCFAR 401). Appeared for the plaintiff in the Court of Final Appeal in an important case which examines the scope and application of the doctrine of contractual estoppel (with Anthony Ismail). Also appeared in the substantive appeal in the Court of Appeal [2021] HKCA 724 (reported in [2021] 5 HKC 1); sole counsel in the Court of Appeal resisting the application for stay pending appeal and for leave to amend the appeal notice [2021] HKCA 134 (reported in [2021] 1 HKLRD 1037); and in the 21-day trial in the Court of First Insance [2019] HKCFI 210. Lam Kin Chung v Soka Gakkai International of Hong Kong Ltd [2022] HKCA 480 (reported in [2022] 4 HKC 202). Appeared for the company in the Court of Appeal, in the first appellate case to determine whether a member of a charitable company has standing to bring a derivative action under ss 732-734 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) in respect of wrongs done to it, and the first to hold that a member of a charitable company in Hong Kong must exercise his voting rights consistently with his fiduciary duty owed to the charitable objects of the company (led by Ambrose Ho S.C. and Michael Yin). Also appeared in the Court of First Instance [2018] HKCFI 747 (reported in [2018] 2 HKLRD 769 and [2018] 4 HKC 489). Fook Lee Holdings Limited v The Secretary for Transport and Housing [2022] HKCA 1855 (reported in [2023] 1 HKLRD 845). Appeared for the company in the Court of Appeal, in an application for leave to appeal against the Lands Tribunal’s interpretation of the Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap. 370) as regards to an applicant’s right to compensation from the Government for loss of temporary occupation of land (with Anthony Ismail). Tai Shing Lee Victor (trading as Lucky Reminbi Exchange Foreign Currency Co.) v Wu Ka Yu Jennie [2023] HKCA 960. Instructed as sole counsel for the appellant in the Court of Appeal, in a case concerning the breach of a services contract between foreign currency exchange operators. Leung Wai Ling Isewesg v Success Base Engineering Limited [2021] HKCA 310 (reported in [2021] 4 HKC 80). Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff landlord in the Court of Appeal, in a case concerning a dispute over the scope of a landlord’s obligations under a tenancy agreement. Also instructed in the Court of First Instance [2020] HKCFI 163. Emperor UA Cinemas Limited v Lark China Cinemas Investments Limited [2022] HKCFI 2316 (reported in [2022] HKCLC 969). Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff company to restrain the defendant company from presenting a winding-up petition. Estivo Limited v Bank Julius Baer & Co Ltd HCA 569/2024. Acting for the plaintiff against the defendant bank in a mis-selling case (led by Norman Nip S.C.) (ongoing). Bong Pik Li and Others v Tang Yi, As the Administratrix of the Estate of Bong Won Ling, Deceased and Others [2025] HKCFI 612. Acting for the defendant administratrix to resist an interlocutory injunction restraining her from administering the deceased’s estate (with Michael Yin) (ongoing). The Incorporated Owners of Wah Chun Industrial Centre & anor v Coca Investment Company Limited [2024] HKCFI 1617 (reported in [2024] 3 HKLRD 388). Acted for the respondent developer to resist an injunction restraining it from interfering with a purported right to use certain areas within an industrial building (led by Jenkin Suen S.C.). Also instructed as sole counsel to resist an application for leave to appeal against a transfer order [2024] HKCFI 3240. 黎偉雄 v 信和物業管理有限公司 (Sino Estates Management Company Limited) & anor [2022] HKLdT 68. Instructed as sole counsel for the respondent building manager in a 5-day billingual trial in the Lands Tribunal concerning the construction of a DMC and alleged breach of manager’s duties. Also instructed as sole counsel to resist the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal [2023] HKLdT 23. Town Planning Appeal No. 7 of 2021 (decision dated 28.02.2023). Instructed as sole counsel for the developer in a 3-day appeal before the Town Planning Appeal Boardagainst the Town Planning Board’s decision to refuse planning permission to construct a house on a site in Ngau Chi Wan Village. OTHER NOTABLE CASES Arbitration Acted for a US company in an HKIAC arbitration involving the breach of a contract concerning the sale and purchase of electronic goods. Building Advised on a question of interpretation arising out of ss B12.7 of the Code of Practice for Fire Safety in Buildings 2011 (led by Benjamin Yu S.C.). In the matter of appeals under s 44 of the Buildings Ordinance (Cap. 123) by the appellants in Appeal Case Nos. 19-23 (decision dated 26.09.2023). Instructed as sole counsel for the appellants in a preliminary hearing before the Buildings Appeal Tribunal appealing against the Building Authority’s orders for demolition of certain alleged unauthorised building works. Advised on the merits of an intended claim against a building contractor and appointed building professional for building works done in commercial premises that were later deemed unauthorised. Building management Advised the manager of a private luxury housing estate on the validity of an owners’ resolution resolving to set up a “special fund” understood within the meaning of Paragraph 4, Schedule 7 of the Building Management Ordinance (Cap. 344). Companies / Winding Up Re Jetlag Limited HCMP 766/2018 (ongoing). Appeared for the applicant in the Companies Court seeking relief under an unfair prejudice petition (with Joyce Leung). Also appeared in the related actions of HCA 834/2020 and HCA 835/2020 (with Joyce Leung). Advised the subsidiary company of a global conglomerate on a proposed application to invalidate a winding-up commenced under s 228A of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32). Re Lee Yang, Shiu Chuen Joyce [2021] HKCFI 2468 (reported in [2021] 4 HKLRD 252 and [2021] 6 HKC 515). Instructed as sole counsel for the applicant in the Court of First Instance, in a case concerning the grant of vesting orders for shares in a company previously held on trust by nominal companies that have been dissolved. The decision is of considerable interest and practical importance in light of its clarification of the law and procedure as regards joining the Secretary for Justice (or Attorney-General in a foreign jurisdiction) as a respondent before property can be properly vested in a beneficiary under s 52(1)(b)(iii) of the Trustee Ordinance (Cap. 29). Civil fraud Zief Incorporated v Tekchandani Ajai Mohan and ors [2021] HKCFI 38 (reported in [2021] 3 HKC 69). Acted for the plaintiff in a 3-day trial in the Court of First Instance, in a case concerning the restitution of funds mistakenly remitted to a third party recipient as a result of fraud (with Joyce Leung). Chow Pui Chu Betty v Ever Bridge Hong Kong International Limited DCCJ 3736/2021. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff in the District Court to obtain summary judgment against a defendant for the return of funds mistakenly remitted to it as a result of fraud. Commercial disputes Goldteam Group Ltd v Qin Hui [2021] HKCFI 2422 (reported in [2021] HKC 708). Appeared for the plaintiff in the Court of First Instance, in a case concerning the recovery of a loan debt of over HK$150 million (led by CY Li S.C.). The decision clarifies a vitally important point of procedural law, namely whether service of a writ within jurisdiction is valid where a defendant, who is not within jurisdiction at the time a writ is delivered, nonetheless acquires knowledge of it at the time and subsequently returns to jurisdiction prior to its expiry. To Yuk Fung v Wu Pun Yan [2020] HKCFI 400. Appeared for the defendant in the Court of First Instance concerning an appeal against a master’s decision on costs (led by Paul Lam S.C.). Maxim’s Caterers Limited v Max Joy Asia Limited [2024] HKDC 660. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff in a trial concerning the breach of a services contract. Employment Sebapharma China Limited and anor v Yeung Mang Yin Simon and ors HCA 610/2024, HCA 1328/2024 and HCA 1611/2024. Instructed by the defendant employee to resist a claim by the former employer for breach of employment contract. A&H Design Group Limited and anor v Cheung Hok Man Randoll and ors HCA 896/2025. Instructed by the plaintiff employer in a claim against a former employee for breach of employment contract. Advised the defendant employer on an application to set aside a judgment entered in its absence at the Labour Tribunal. Insurance Lo Siu Wa v Employees Compensation Assistance Fund Board and anor [2018] HKCFA 3 (reported in (2018) 21 HKCFAR 8 and [2018] 2 HKC 40). Appeared for a major insurance company in the Court of Final Appeal, in a case concerning the breadth of coverage of an insurance agreement understood in the context of the compulsory insurance scheme under Part IV of the Employees' Compensation Ordinance (Cap. 282) (with Anthony Ismail). Asia Shahid t/a International Business Point (Hong Kong) v China Ping An Insurance (Hong Kong) Company Limited [2023] HKCFI 1296 (reported in [2023] 4 HKC 35). Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff insured in the Court of First Instance, in an appeal against a master’s decision to strike out the insured’s claim on grounds of limitation. Land / property Chan Ka Fook v Chan Choi Kwong [2025] HKDC 1362. Instructed as sole counsel for the defendant in an 8-day bilingual trial to resist a claim for title over landed property. Wang Boheng v Yu Kafu [2025] HKCFI 4566. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff buyer in an action against the defendant seller for breach of a sale and purchase agreement of a property. Hill Concept Limited v Yuen Yun [2024] HKDC 1999. Instructed as sole counsel for the plaintiff developer in an action against the defendant buyer for breach of a sale and purchase agreement of a property. Landlord and tenant Re UA Cinemas Circuit Limited HCCW 99/2021. Instructed as sole counsel for the applicant landlord in the Companies Court seeking (1) leave to commence proceedings against the respondent tenant company (formerly a well-known company running a chain of cinemas in Hong Kong) upon its presentation of a winding-up petition and (2) an order for immediate possession of premises. Jade Mate Limited v Chickeeduck Retail (Hong Kong) Limited HCA 1344/2020. Appeared for the plaintiff landlord in the Court of First Instance seeking an injunction to remove an unauthorised article from the defendant tenant’s shop premises (led by CY Li S.C.). 勤學樂園 對 黎嘉年及另一人 [2024] HKDC 585. Acted for the 1st Defendant in an application to strike out the Plaintiff’s claim for want of a reasonable cause of action. Proceedings were conducted in Chinese. Personal injuries Advised on the quantum of damages to be awarded to a person falling within the “Disaster” category of personal injuries (assisting Alice Mok, S.C.). Advised on the prospects of a claim for tort against the person arising out of an incident during the period of social unrest in 2019 (assisting Alice Mok, S.C.). Probate and administration In re the estate of Herman Hendrik Alberts [2019] HKCFI 2900. Instructed as sole counsel for the applicant in the Court of First Instance in a 2-day trial to resist the invalidation of a purported will and to obtain a grant of letters of administration. Public law / judicial review Chao Wei Ting Ronna v Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (interested party: Building Authority) [2019] HKCFI 2950 (reported in [2020] 1 HKLRD 467). Appeared for the interested parties in the Court of First Instance in a judicial review of a decision of the Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (with Anthony Ismail). Building Authority v Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (interested parties: Freedom Pacific Limited, Wave Treasure Investment Limited) [2018] HKCFI 2761 (reported in [2019] 1 HKLRD 513). Appeared for the interested parties in the Court of First Instance to resist a judicial review of a decision of the Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (with Anthony Ismail). Also instructed as sole counsel to vary a costs order nisi [2020] HKCFI 1245. Leelan Rukesh Marasinghe v Director-General of Civil Aviation [2022] HKCFI 2843. Appeared for the applicant in the Court of First Instance, in an application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Director’s decision to suspend the applicant’s medical certificate thereby rendering him unable to perform his licensed functions as a commercial pilot (led by Robert Whitehead S.C. and Thomas Lee). Town planning Town Planning Board v Town Planning Appeal Board FACV 8/2016 (unrep., 16.02.2017) (reported in (2017) 20 HKCFAR 196 and [2017] 2 HKC 372). Appeared for the interested parties in the Court of Final Appeal, in a case concerning whether the Town Planning Board has jurisdiction under s 17 of the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131) to review its own decisions on the fulfilment of conditions imposed when granting planning permission (led by Anthony Neoh S.C. and Anthony Ismail). Other Advised a major U.S. corporation on the consumer protection regime in Hong Kong as well as the interrelationship between representative proceedings brought under RHC O.15, r.12 and the class action regime brought under U.S. law (assisting Ambrose Ho S.C.). SEMINARS “Liquidation & Cross-border Insolvency: updates and practical tips”, CPD seminar (with Joyce Leung and Johnathan Tsang) (2025) “Common issues and practical tips on proceedings on administration of estates”, ALE webinar (with Jenkin Suen S.C.) (2024) “Recent updates on contentious probate”, CPD seminar (with Ambrose Ho S.C. and Michael Yin) (2024) “Recent SFC Enforcement Actions in Ramp and Dump Cases”, CPD seminar (with Norman Nip S.C., Adrian C.K. Wong and Roger Phang) (2022) “Judicial review against decisions of the Building Authority”, Law Lectures for Practitioners 2019 (held by the Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong) (with Anthony Ismail) “Plugging the Expectation Gap: The Future of Charities Regulation in Hong Kong”, CPD seminar (with Ambrose Ho S.C.) (2018)
Rede Chambers
Justin Wolosz
Partner
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Justus Schmidt-Ott
Partner
Raue
Jyoti Kumar Chaudhary
Senior Partner
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Jérôme Marsaudon
Partner
Reinhart Marville Torre
Jérôme WIEHN
Partner
Cornet Vincent Ségurel
Jörg Jaecks
Partner
Raue
Jörg Risse
Joerg Risse is widely recognized as one of Germany's leading arbitration lawyers. Being double-qualified as an attorney-at-law in Germany and in New York (USA), he represents his clients in international arbitration proceedings under the rules of all major institutions. Joerg Risse is one of Germany's most-in-demand arbitrators; as a result, his clients also benefit from his judiciary "outlook" on a case. Joerg Risse teaches dispute resolution and advocacy skills at the University of Mannheim and at Humboldt-University, Berlin. Joerg Risse focuses on corporate law and post-merger & acquisition disputes, in particular on price adjustment claims, accounting and tax related disputes and reps & warranty claims. His second main area of practice are disputes related to large infrastructure projects such as power plants, airports, offshore wind farms and public transport projects. Most of his clients are companies form the chemical, automotive, medical and mass transport industry. Joerg Risse has special expertise in ADR proceedings where he advises his clients in settlement negotiations, mediation and adjudication proceedings.
Baker McKenzie
Jörgen Eklund
Partner.
CMS Wistrand
Jørgen Vinding
Partner
Schjødt Advokatpartnerselskab
Júlia Schledorn de Camargo
Partner
Mello Torres
Jürg Rieben
Jürg Rieben acts as a counsel for Wenger Plattner. He advises clients on Corporate and Commercial law and corporate transactions. As former Chairman of Berner Kantonalbank, he has extensive expertise in banking and financial markets law. Jürg Rieben also specialises in Health law, advising health insurance companies, hospitals and medical practitioners. Jürg Rieben has expertise and experience in arbitration.
Wenger Plattner
Jürg Simon
Partner, Co-Head of Intellectual Property
Lenz & Staehelin
Jürgen Brönnimann
Attorney-at-Law, Of Counsel
Bratschi Ltd
Jürgen Ehrlichmann
Jürgen is the Head of the Real Estate & Infrastructure team. His wide-ranging experience includes advising real estate and commercial enterprises as well as banking organisations on developing long-term strategies. He is specialised in commercial tenancy law and strategic optimisation of operating and energy costs, and collaborates with companies focused in these areas. With about twenty years' experience, Jürgen is considered by his clients to bring a commercial approach to the table, working with them and the other side to achieve the required result both swiftly and efficiently.
Osborne Clarke GmbH & Co. KG
K.C. Hightower
Partner
Balch & Bingham LLP
Kaehyung Yang
Senior Foreign Attorney
Lee & Ko
Kah Wah Leong
Partner, Shipping & International Trade
Rajah & Tann Asia
Kai Li
Partner
Fangda Partners
Kai Rüting
PARTNER, Rechtsanwalt (Attorney-at-Law), UPC Representative He specializes in national and cross-border patent litigation. Kai has comprehensive litigation experience, in particular in the areas of standard-related patents, electronics, medical technology, chemistry and life sciences. He also has broad experience advising international clients on strategies relating to enforcement of IP rights in Europe. Kai publishes regularly and lectures on current issues of patent and procedural law. He is inter alia co-author of the widely acclaimed "Cepl/Voß, Prozesskommentar zum Gewerblichen Rechtsschutz" (commentary on German procedural law in IP), 3nd edition published in 2022. Kai is recommended in Chambers Global 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 "Germany – Intellectual Property" as "Foreign Expert for USA". Managing IP describes him in Patent Editorial 2018 as "brilliant litigator whose solutions are all very well-considered". According to JUVE, Kai is "technically competent and success-oriented" (Patent Litigation 2018), “highly professional” with “excellent expertise” (Patent Litigation 2019), “well thought-out and structured” (Patent Litigation 2020) as well as “experienced, pragmatic, good” (Patent Litigation 2021/2022). He is also named as being among the world’s leading patent lawyers (Who’s Who Legal: Patents 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022), leading figures in the IP field (Who is Who Legal IP 2022) and being among the highest-ranked lawyers (Who is Who Legal: Germany 2024). Who’s Who Legal recommends him also for the categories Life Sciences (2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024), IP (2021, 2023), Patent Litigation (2022, 2023, 2024) and “Thought Leaders Germany” (2021, 2022). IAM Patent Ranking ranks him in the category “infringement” (2020) and is listed in IAM Strategy 300 (2019, 2020, 2021) as being among “The World’s Leading IP Strategists”. Furthermore, Kai is listed in the IAM Patent 1000 Ranking (category “Individuals – Infringement”) and is quoted as “very thorough and practical in his approach”. Kai has been selected by Best Lawyers in Germany for Intellectual Property Law (2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024). Legal 500 recommends him in the sectors Electronics, Medical Devices and Life Sciences.
Vossius & Partner
Kajsa Minor
Partner
Shartsis Friese LLP
Kamal Mukhi
Kamal’s practice focuses on commercial litigation and arbitration, shipping, energy and international trade, and he also regularly advises on trade finance, sanctions, insurance issues, shareholders’ disputes and directors’ duties, commercial contracts, freezing injunctions and asset tracing and committal applications. Dual-qualified in England and India, Kamal has been involved in many matters before the English courts, ICC, LCIA, GAFTA, FOSFA, LMAA, Refined Sugar Association, Sugar Association of London, the Nuts Association and the British Coffee Association.
Keystone Law